研究者学術情報データベース

ミヤオ　マリ
宮尾　万理
MIYAO Mari

所属産業社会学部現代社会学科

職名准教授

学会発表
1.	2021/03/28	The use of linguistic and visual discourse information in the L2 production of referring expressions (Japan Second Language Association 2020)
2.	2018/07/28	Difference in referential-expression preferences between Japanese and Chinese readers (MAPLL x TCP x TL x TaLK 2018)
3.	2018/06/17	On integrating syntax and discourse in the L2 production of English referential expressions (The 18th Annual Conference of the Japan Second Language Association)
4.	2017/04/01	Influence of competitors on the L2 production of English referential expressions (The 30th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing)
5.	2015/10/31	L1 influence in the processing of referring expressions by Chinese and Japanese L2ers of English (Second Language Research Forum 2015)
6.	2015/09/15	L1 influence in Chinese and Japanese L2ers' processing of English referring expressions (The 2nd Chuo-UHM Student Conference on Linguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Second Language Acquisition)
7.	2015/03/21	Referential-expression preferences in English and Japanese discourse during online reading (The 28th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing)
8.	2015/03/05	Referential-expression preferences in L2-English discourse during online comprehension (The 13th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition)
9.	2014/09/16	Number of discourse entities and production of referential expressions in English and Japanese (The 1st Chuo-UHM Student Conference on Linguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Second Language Acquisition)
10.	2012/11/02	Saliency of discourse entities and production of referential expressions in L2 English (The 37th Boston University Conference on Language Development)
11.	2012/06/05	Case, scrambling, and pragmatics in L1-English children acquiring Japanese (L2 at the Syntax-Pragmatics Interface)
12.	2011/09/09	Case markers and scrambling in L1-English children acquiring Japanese as a second language (Culture in Perspective—Japanese Language Education and Cultural Translation)
13.	2010/10/17	L2 processing and number agreement: More than just linearity (Second Language Research Forum 2010)
14.	2010/09/01	Does linear distance explain L2 (in)sensitivity to agreement violations in online processing? (Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America 4)
15.	2009/11/06	Proficiency effects in nonnative processing of number agreement in English (The 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development)
16.	2009/09/10	Dissociations between knowledge and performance in nonnatives' processing of number agreement in English (Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2009)
17.	2009/05/24	L2 sensitivity to online number disagreement (Second Language Processing and Parsing: State of the Science)
18.	2009/03/28	Nonnatives' knowledge and processing of number agreement in English (The 22nd CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing)
19.	2008/10/18	On knowledge and processing of grammatical number of nonnatives (Second Language Research Forum 2008)
20.	2007/11/02	English passives acquired before Japanese passives in bilingual Japanese-English children (The 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development)
21.	2007/11/02	Incrementality, predictability, and the use of traces in L2 Japanese processing (The 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development)
22.	2007/09	On detailed morphological analysis in L2 sentence processing (The 17th European Second Language Acquisition)
23.	2007/04/14	Comprehension of passives by young Japanese children (The 11th Annual Student Conference of the College of Languages, Linguistics, and Literature)
24.	2007/04/14	Processing of wh-questions by L2 Japanese learners (The 11th Annual Student Conference of the College of Languages, Linguistics, and Literature)
25.	2006/04/08	Syntactic ambiguity resolution by L2 learners: Relative clause attachment in Japanese (The 10th Annual Student Conference of the College of Languages, Linguistics, and Literature)
26.	2005/11/05	No ambiguity about it: Korean learners of Japanese have a clear attachment preference (The 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development)